Optimize Water Ballast in 5 Steps
How much water ballast should you use on any given day? This is not an all-or-nothing type of tool. Some pilots will takeoff full every day and dump down in timed increments (20 seconds, for example). However, if you have a stock water system, the tail ballast will dump at a faster ratio, meaning it will drain the tail before the wings are empty, moving the CG forward as you dump. So you might still be at 3/4 wing ballast with no tail ballast and an extreme forward CG. A forward CG can lead to difficulty climbing in thermals.
So we can take some tips from Leo and Ricky Brigliadori's book Competing in Gliders:
Start by answering five questions. I have included the following tables that will help guide you to a recommended wing loading.
- What is the average lift strength for the day?
- What is the thermal size, consistency, and workability (to get an idea, you could look at the buoyancy sheer ratio)?
- What is the workable height band?
- What type of Soaring flight do you expect? Thermal, wave, slope, convergence, streeting
- Are there significant headwinds?
Look at the table to determine the associated values:
Parameters | Units | Possible Value for Your Choices | ||
Average thermal strength | Knots | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Value | 10 | 85 | 100 | |
Thermal size and irregularity (B/S is a good reference) | Diameter | Narrow | Normal | Large |
Value | 20 | 85 | 100 | |
Available working band | Feet AGL | <1600 | 1600-3300 | >3300 |
Value | 20 | 80 | 100 | |
Type of Soaring | Thermals | Wave | Ridge (=cloud streets) | |
Value | 60 | 100 | 100 | |
Wind | Knots | <20 | >20 | |
Value | 0 | 100 |
What is the wing-loading range on your glider? For example,e we will use a glider with a range of 34 kg/m² to 52 kg/m². That means we can change it by 18 incremental points.
The following table is the theoretical maximum value for each parameter used to calculate the result.
Average thermal strength | 30% |
Thermal size and irregularity (B/S is a good reference) | 10% |
Available working band | 30% |
Type of Soaring | 20% |
Wind | 10% |
total | 100% |
We have everything to determine what wing loading we should be flying at. The example day is: 4knt thermals to 6000ft with evenly spaced thermals, no streeting, a B/S ratio of 10+, and a long final leg into a 20knt headwind.
Parameters | Choice | Value | Result |
Average thermal strength | 4 | 85 | 25.5 |
Thermal size and irregularity (B/S is a good reference) | large | 100 | 10 |
Available working band | >3300 | 100 | 30 |
Type of Soaring | thermals | 60 | 12 |
Wind | >20 | 100 | 10 |
total | 87.5% |
Based on the above tables, I would ballast to get 87.5% of my wing loading. 87.5% x 18 = 15.75 suggested wing loading increments. The plan would be to take off at 49.75 kg/m². Now, I can have the CG at the optimal location for that wing loading. The tables above are a great way to start figuring out your glider and understanding how it handles. You might want to change your values or parameters depending on your experience. In my Nimbus 3, I rarely got the wing loading to be heavy enough.
The newer gliders carry their water better than the older ones. They have a wider range than previous generations. This was noticeable between the Discus and the Discus 2. I would routinely carry the water longer in the Discus 2ax (part of that might have been I had more experience and didn't get stuck nearly as often).
The key to remember is that water ballast is not an all-or-nothing tool we can use. This should be a good guide to help make your water ballast more efficient.
Banner photo by Mika Ganszauge